Game Informer mis-imformed about the Wii-Mote

[Bran-Man]

I recently got the latest issue of game informer where they review the PS3 and the Wii. They had pros and cons about each system and each one of those are understandable. Except of course their complaint about the Wii-Mote battery life.

They complained that the Wii-motes had no way at all to inform you that your batteries are low. Well, I guess they didn't know that while playing a game, you can push the Home button and the little menu will tell you how much battery life each sync'd remote has.

But none the less, they still gave the PS3 a B+ and the Wii an A-

So that somewhat changes my thoughts of Game Informer being biast towards Sony.

[Next-Gen.]

Seems like a pretty big mistake on there end. They better make a statement on it in there next issue

[agent71]

I was pretty suprised when I saw my issue of EGM. They rated each system and said which one was better. Yes, the Wii did win but they barley won. The scores where 6.3 to 6.5. I have no idea why they gave it a 6.5 but once I turned the page I felt a little better. They asked all of the editors(about 7 people) which system they liked the best, and every single one of them said the Wii.

[Nicko9y]

agent71 said:

I was pretty suprised when I saw my issue of EGM. They rated each system and said which one was better. Yes, the Wii did win but they barley won. The scores where 6.3 to 6.5. I have no idea why they gave it a 6.5 but once I turned the page I felt a little better. They asked all of the editors(about 7 people) which system they liked the best, and every single one of them said the Wii.

That was based on the launch titles.

Both systems had pretty poor launch titles, in the middle of some good ones.

[cornbin]

Haha,ha,hahaha. Poor Game Informer, write to them. They have a section or mistakes they made right? Also clever title branman